From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Thomas

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 27, 2006
261 F. App'x 451 (4th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

No. 06-7642.

Submitted: November 15, 2006.

Decided: November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:99-cr-00477-CMH).

Christopher Lee Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).


Christopher Lee Thomas appeals district court orders denying his Rule 60(b) motion and his Rule 59 motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Thomas, No. 1:99-cr-00477-CMH (E.D. Va. filed June 13, 2006), and entered June 14, 2006; Aug. 18, 2006. We deny Thomas' motion for a stay. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Thomas

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 27, 2006
261 F. App'x 451 (4th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Christopher Lee THOMAS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 27, 2006

Citations

261 F. App'x 451 (4th Cir. 2006)