From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Texas Municipal Retirement System

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Dec 29, 2006
CASE NO. 4:06mc14 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2006)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:06mc14.

December 29, 2006


MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Came on for consideration the Report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to United States Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 4, 2006, the Report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing his proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the Defendant's claim for exemption of certain property garnished by the United States is not valid.

The Court, having heard no objections raised or timely filed, is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Therefore, the Court hereby adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court. It is, therefore,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Defendant's claim for exemption is DENIED and final judgment on the writ of garnishment is GRANTED in the form submitted by the United States.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Texas Municipal Retirement System

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division
Dec 29, 2006
CASE NO. 4:06mc14 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Texas Municipal Retirement System

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TEXAS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT SYSTEM and HELEN…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Sherman Division

Date published: Dec 29, 2006

Citations

CASE NO. 4:06mc14 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 29, 2006)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Lawrence

ited States, 501 U.S. 923, 927-40 (1991). Some FDCPA decisions rendered by magistrate judges, while not…

U.S. v. Lawrence

Oct. 29, 2001), while others have been on a report and recommendation basis, see United States v. Pugh, 445…