From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Tempro

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jun 20, 2002
01 CV 4599 (ILG) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 20, 2002)

Opinion

01 CV 4599 (ILG)

June 20, 2002


MEMORANDUM ORDER


On February 22, 2002, plaintiff moved for summary judgment in this student loan case. Plaintiff, however, does not appear to have satisfied its obligation, under Local Rule 56.2 of this Court, of notifying the pro se defendant of the consequences of failing to respond to its summary judgment motion. See Vital v. Interfaith Med. Ctr., 168 F.3d 615, 620 (2d Cir. 1999); Champion v. Artuz, 76 F.3d 483. 486 (2d Cir. 1996). Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied, without prejudice to renewal upon serving the defendant with the notice required by Local Rule 56.2.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Tempro

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jun 20, 2002
01 CV 4599 (ILG) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 20, 2002)
Case details for

U.S. v. Tempro

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. SUZANNE A. TEMPRO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Jun 20, 2002

Citations

01 CV 4599 (ILG) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 20, 2002)