From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Sutton

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Feb 24, 2009
Criminal Action No. 5:08-CR-40(HL) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 24, 2009)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 5:08-CR-40(HL).

February 24, 2009


ORDER


Berrien and Lisa Sutton's Joint Motion in Limine Regarding Government's use of the Term "Corruption" (Doc. 262) is denied as moot because the Suttons withdrew this Motion in their Joint Report to the Court (Doc. 301).

The Suttons' Motion in Limine Regarding Court Authorization for Warrants and/or Electronic Surveillance (Doc. 264) is granted. The Government agrees with the Suttons that it is not necessary to mention that the undersigned authorized any search warrants and electronic surveillance in this case. When necessary, witnesses shall refer to such warrants and surveillance as being authorized by "the Court."

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

U.S. v. Sutton

United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division
Feb 24, 2009
Criminal Action No. 5:08-CR-40(HL) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 24, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Sutton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. BERRIEN AND LISA SUTTON, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division

Date published: Feb 24, 2009

Citations

Criminal Action No. 5:08-CR-40(HL) (M.D. Ga. Feb. 24, 2009)