U.S. v. Stuart

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL LEE STUART, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 26, 2006

Case No. 04-CR-80439 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 04-CR-80439.

January 26, 2006

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

GEORGE STEEH, District Judge

Defendant Daniel Stuart moves for reconsideration of this court's January 9, 2006 Order denying his demand for aFranks ¹ hearing. Generally, and without restricting the court's discretion, the court will not grant a motion for reconsideration that merely presents the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(3). The movant must demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been mislead. Id. Defendant merely presents the same issues that have been thoroughly reviewed and ruled upon by the court, and fails to demonstrate a palpable defect in the court's rulings. Accordingly,

1 Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978).

Defendant's motion for reconsideration is hereby DENIED.

SO ORDERED.