From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Strang

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois
Mar 19, 2002
00 CR 50057 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 19, 2002)

Opinion

00 CR 50057

March 19, 2002


ORDER


Harold Strang, a federal prisoner in custody pursuant to his conviction and sentence for a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, has filed pro se a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis stating he has constitutional issues to bring in a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, but has not specified those issues. Instead, he asks for a transcript of the proceedings so that he may determine such issues to present. Transcripts are not yet prepared, and Strang has not demonstrated that any potential § 2255 motion is not frivolous and that the transcript is needed to decide any constitutional issue in order for this court to certify a free transcript is necessary pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753.See United States v. MacCollom, 426 U.S. 317 (1976).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Strang

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois
Mar 19, 2002
00 CR 50057 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 19, 2002)
Case details for

U.S. v. Strang

Case Details

Full title:U.S.A. v. STRANG

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois

Date published: Mar 19, 2002

Citations

00 CR 50057 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 19, 2002)