From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Stoltz

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 27, 2011
Criminal No. 11-96 (RHK/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 27, 2011)

Opinion

Criminal No. 11-96 (RHK/LIB).

June 27, 2011


ORDER


Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois, Defendant's Objections thereto, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Objections (Doc. No. 49) are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 48) is ADOPTED;

3. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure (Doc. No. 25) is DENIED;

4. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions and Answers (Doc. No. 26) is DENIED; and

5. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Eyewitness Identifications (Doc. No. 27) is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Stoltz

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jun 27, 2011
Criminal No. 11-96 (RHK/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 27, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Stoltz

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey Allen Stoltz, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jun 27, 2011

Citations

Criminal No. 11-96 (RHK/LIB) (D. Minn. Jun. 27, 2011)

Citing Cases

United States v. Clark

was Trooper Christopherson justified in ordering Defendant to exit the vehicle pursuant to a valid traffic…

United States v. Blandford

There is no evidence that Otterson manipulated the objects in Leigland's pockets before making this…