From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Stinson

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Mar 20, 2006
Criminal File No. 1:05-CR-426-TWT (N.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2006)

Summary

explaining irrelevance of police officer's belief he did not have probable cause at time of arrest

Summary of this case from United States v. Wright

Opinion

Criminal File No. 1:05-CR-426-TWT.

March 20, 2006


ORDER AND ORDER


This is a criminal action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 23] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 12]. For the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge, the ATF agents had probable cause to arrest the Defendant, the search warrant described the items to be seized with reasonable particularity, and there was no violation of the Fourth Amendment by beginning the search before the agent arrived at the apartment with the warrant. After careful consideration of the Defendant's Objections, the Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 12] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Stinson

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Mar 20, 2006
Criminal File No. 1:05-CR-426-TWT (N.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2006)

explaining irrelevance of police officer's belief he did not have probable cause at time of arrest

Summary of this case from United States v. Wright
Case details for

U.S. v. Stinson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. KIJUAN EZEKIAL STINSON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division

Date published: Mar 20, 2006

Citations

Criminal File No. 1:05-CR-426-TWT (N.D. Ga. Mar. 20, 2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Wright

.g., Devenpeck, 543 U.S. at 153 (explaining arresting officer's state of mind is irrelevant to probable…