From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Stevenson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 29, 2009
329 F. App'x 466 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-6401.

Submitted: July 23, 2009.

Decided: July 29, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00046-FPS-JES-1; 1:06-cv-00092-FPS-JES).

Lee Ronald Stevenson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hugh McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Lee Ronald Stevenson seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Stevenson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Stevenson's claim that his attorney was ineffective in failing to challenge the validity of the predicate state conviction underlying his federal conviction was neither procedurally barred nor procedurally defaulted, but we conclude that it is without merit.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Stevenson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 29, 2009
329 F. App'x 466 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Stevenson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lee Ronald STEVENSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 29, 2009

Citations

329 F. App'x 466 (4th Cir. 2009)