From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 25, 2008
266 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-4853.

Submitted: February 21, 2008.

Decided: February 25, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:07-cr-00076-D).

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. George E.B. Holding, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Banumathi Rangarajan, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Darrell Lavon Smith pled guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924 (2000). After granting Smith's motion for a downward departure, the district court sentenced him to 41 months' imprisonment, the low end of the advisory guidelines range. Smith appeals his sentence. We affirm.

We review the sentence to determine whether it is reasonable, applying an abuse of discretion standard. Gall v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 586, 590, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). We find that the district court properly applied the advisory guidelines and considered the relevant sentencing factors before imposing the 41-month sentence. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 Supp. 2007). Additionally, we find that the sentence imposed was reasonable. See United States v. Johnson, 445 F.3d 339, 341 (4th Cir. 2006); Rita v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2462-69, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007) (upholding presumption of reasonableness accorded within-guidelines sentence). Accordingly, we affirm Smith's sentence.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 25, 2008
266 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Darrell Lavon SMITH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 25, 2008

Citations

266 F. App'x 245 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Smith v. United States

Darrell Lavon SMITH, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.Case below, 266 Fed.Appx. 245. Petition for writ of…