From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 19, 2007
235 F. App'x 449 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-30653.

Submitted July 9, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed July 19, 2007.

Office of the U.S. Attorney, Great Falls, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Evangelo Arvanetes, Esq., Federal Defenders of Montana, Great Falls, MT, for Defendants-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00145-SEH.

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Ronnie Lynn Smith appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following remand.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Smith's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed. The government has filed notification that it does not intend to file an answering brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 19, 2007
235 F. App'x 449 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronnie Lynn SMITH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 19, 2007

Citations

235 F. App'x 449 (9th Cir. 2007)