From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 17, 2008
300 F. App'x 249 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6410.

Submitted: November 5, 2008.

Decided: November 17, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James P. Jones, Chief District Judge. (3:94-cr-00041-jpj-1).

Tyrone Lamont Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Tyrone Lamont Smith appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). Smith argues that the district court erred by failing to reduce his sentence under Amendment 706 of the Guidelines, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual ("USSG") § 2D1.1(c) (2007 Supp. 2008); USSG App. C, Amend. 706. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:94-cr-00041-jpj-1 (W.D.Va. Feb. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Smith

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 17, 2008
300 F. App'x 249 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tyrone Lamont SMITH…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 17, 2008

Citations

300 F. App'x 249 (4th Cir. 2008)