From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Slanina

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 27, 2002
313 F.3d 891 (5th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

No. 00-20926.

November 27, 2002.

Kathlyn Giannaula Snyder (argued), James Lee Turner, Asst. U.S. Attys., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roland E. Dahlin, II, Fed. Pub. Def., Timothy William Crooks, Asst. Fed. Pub. Def., Renata Ann Gowie, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Sam R. Cummings, Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before JOLLY, SMITH and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.


IT IS ORDERED that appellant's motion for summary remand is GRANTED. We view the Supreme Court order of remand to this court as vacating the judgment of this court, not the judgment and conviction of the district court. We remand to the district court, as suggested by both parties, so that the district court may decide in the first instance the impact of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234, 122 S.Ct. 1389, 152 L.Ed.2d 403 (2002), on the judgment of conviction and sentence.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Slanina

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 27, 2002
313 F.3d 891 (5th Cir. 2002)
Case details for

U.S. v. Slanina

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Wesley Joseph SLANINA…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Nov 27, 2002

Citations

313 F.3d 891 (5th Cir. 2002)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Bailey

Use of passwords and locking office doors to restrict an employer's access to computer files is evidence of…

U.S. v. Bailey

Use of passwords and locking office doors to restrict an employer's access to computer files is evidence of…