From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Skrzypek

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Apr 24, 2006
No. 97 CR 516 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 24, 2006)

Opinion

No. 97 CR 516.

April 24, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Defendant James Skrzypek was granted leave by the Court of Appeals to file a brief supplemental to that filed by his appointed counsel. He then moved in the Court of Appeals to compel production of material to assist in his appeal, primarily relating to a search on July 23, 1997. While that motion was pending, he requested Michael Dobbins, Clerk, on April 14, 2006, for copies of those materials, and that request was referred to this court.

We treat the request as a motion. The Court of Appeals denied the motion to compel on April 18, 2006, with a direction that the supplemental brief not refer to documents outside of the record on appeal. We do not understand that anything was omitted by error or accident, and we believe that the motion was properly addressed to the Court of Appeals pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(e)(3). That court has ruled. We deny the motion.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Skrzypek

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Apr 24, 2006
No. 97 CR 516 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 24, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Skrzypek

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES SKRZYPEK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Apr 24, 2006

Citations

No. 97 CR 516 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 24, 2006)