From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Sherill

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 4, 2011
420 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 09-7030.

Submitted: March 31, 2011.

Decided: April 4, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:95-cr-00005-FDW-8).

Noell Peter Tin, Tin, Fulton, Walker Owen, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Bernard Donnell Sherill appeals the district court's order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Sherill, No. 3:95-cr-00005-FDW-8 (W.D.N.C. May 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Sherill

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 4, 2011
420 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Sherill

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernard Donnell SHERILL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 4, 2011

Citations

420 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2011)