From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Sharp

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Apr 7, 2010
No. 1-09-cr-98 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 7, 2010)

Opinion

No. 1-09-cr-98.

April 7, 2010


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter filed his report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 59(a) [Court Doc. 424]. Neither party filed objections within the given 14 days.

After reviewing the record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Carter's report and recommendation. The Court thus ACCEPTS and ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Carter's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations pursuant to § 636(b)(1) and Rule 59(a).

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Motion to Suppress Evidence [Court Doc. 384] and Motion of Defendant to Disclose Name of Confidential Informants and Brief in Support [Court Doc. 384] be DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Sharp

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Apr 7, 2010
No. 1-09-cr-98 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 7, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Sharp

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RYAN SHARP

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga

Date published: Apr 7, 2010

Citations

No. 1-09-cr-98 (E.D. Tenn. Apr. 7, 2010)