From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Sexton

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division
Oct 28, 2009
CASE NO.: 1:09-CR-40-TS (N.D. Ind. Oct. 28, 2009)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:09-CR-40-TS.

October 28, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Government's Motion to Strike Defendant's Pro Se Filings [DE 38]. The Defendant filed a Verified Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [DE 35] on October 16, 2009, and a second Verified Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [DE 37] filed on October 26, 2009. The Government requests, in part, that the Court strike the Petitions [DE 35 and DE 37]. The Court struck the Petitions by its Order [DE 39] dated October 28, 2009, because they were filed directly by the Defendant, despite Defendant's representation by counsel.

Along with his October 16, 2009 filings, the Defendant included a Letter [DE 34] requesting to be moved to another facility from the Allen County Jail, similar to the relief requested in his first Petition [DE 37]. The Government's Motion [DE 38] also requests to strike Defendant's Letter [DE 34]. Not only is defendant's Letter duplicative of his first Petition and such a matter properly addressed to the Court through Defendant's counsel, the Court notes that Defendant is now housed in the Porter County Jail, as indicated by Defendant's second Petition [DE 37] and confirmed by the office of Defendant's counsel.

The Court, being duly advised, GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES AS MOOT IN PART the Government's Motion to Strike [DE 38]. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the Clerk of this Court to STRIKE the Defendant's Letter [DE 34], but the Letter is to remain part of the record.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

U.S. v. Sexton

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division
Oct 28, 2009
CASE NO.: 1:09-CR-40-TS (N.D. Ind. Oct. 28, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Sexton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DELMAS SEXTON II

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division

Date published: Oct 28, 2009

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:09-CR-40-TS (N.D. Ind. Oct. 28, 2009)