From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Schubert

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jun 28, 2006
Case No. CR-05-78-HE (W.D. Okla. Jun. 28, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. CR-05-78-HE.

June 28, 2006


ORDER FOR DISPOSITION OF GARNISHED FUNDS


The United States of America caused a Writ of Garnishment to be issued to AXA Equitable on December 8, 2005 (Doc. 22). On January 23, 2006, the garnishee filed an Answer (Doc. 25). Defendant filed a Claim of Exemption and Request for Hearing on January 30, 2006 (Doc. 26). A Claim of Exemption Hearing was held on June 6, 2006.

On June 7, 2006, United States Magistrate Judge Doyle Argo entered a Report and Recommendation in this case recommending that defendant Schubert's claim for exemption be denied and that the garnishee be ordered to remit to the U.S. Court Clerk defendant Schubert's interest in the monies and properties it holds for her. No party has filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and thus the right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed has been waived. United States v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059-60 (10th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 909 (1996). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); LCvR72.1(a).

Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Argo's Report and Recommendation. The garnishee is ordered to remit all monies and property of defendant Schubert that it has held for the defendant's benefit since the service of the writ of garnishment, to the U.S. District Court Clerk, 200 NW 4th Street, Suite 1210, Oklahoma City, OK 73102.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Schubert

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jun 28, 2006
Case No. CR-05-78-HE (W.D. Okla. Jun. 28, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Schubert

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/Garnishor, v. MARSHA KAY SCHUBERT…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 28, 2006

Citations

Case No. CR-05-78-HE (W.D. Okla. Jun. 28, 2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Bomhak

The exemption is limited to the specific pension plans listed in the statute. See United States v. Schubert,…