From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Savage

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 21, 2010
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 07-550-03 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 21, 2010)

Summary

surveying case law and finding that defendants who challenge SAMs provisions as part of their underlying criminal case do not need to exhaust administrative remedies

Summary of this case from United States v. Trabelsi

Opinion

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 07-550-03.

October 21, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant Kaboni Savage's Motion for Relief from Special Administrative Measures (ECF No. 137), and all papers submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, and after hearing in open court, it is ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED consistent with the accompanying Memorandum.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Savage

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 21, 2010
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 07-550-03 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 21, 2010)

surveying case law and finding that defendants who challenge SAMs provisions as part of their underlying criminal case do not need to exhaust administrative remedies

Summary of this case from United States v. Trabelsi
Case details for

U.S. v. Savage

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KABONI SAVAGE

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 21, 2010

Citations

CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 07-550-03 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 21, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Trabelsi

Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, Trabelsi may be required to exhaust any available administrative…

United States v. Savage

We determined in our Memorandum and Order of October 21, 2010, that Defendant was not required to exhaust his…