From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Santiago-Cruz

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 12, 2010
366 F. App'x 509 (5th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-20116 Conference Calendar.

February 12, 2010.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Lourdes Rodriguez, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, USDC No. 4:08-CR-452-1.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.


The attorney appointed to represent Maximiano Santiago-Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Santiago-Cruz has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Santiago-Cruz's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally "cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations." United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Santiago-Cruz's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Santiago-Cruz's motion to proceed pro se is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th Cir. 1998).


Summaries of

U.S. v. Santiago-Cruz

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 12, 2010
366 F. App'x 509 (5th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Santiago-Cruz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Maximiano SANTIAGO-CRUZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 12, 2010

Citations

366 F. App'x 509 (5th Cir. 2010)