From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Sanofi Synthelabo, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Dec 30, 2010
Civ. Action No. 05-2927 (KSH) (D.N.J. Dec. 30, 2010)

Opinion

Civ. Action No. 05-2927 (KSH).

December 30, 2010


ORDER


This matter having come before the Court by way of a motion [D.E. 35] by defendants Sanofi Synthelabo, Inc. and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to dismiss plaintiff Joseph Piacentile's Second Amended Complaint [D.E. 34]; and the Court having considered the parties' arguments and written submissions; and for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion filed herewith,

IT IS on this 30th day of December, 2010,

ORDERED that Sanofi and Aventis's motion [D.E. 35] is granted, and Piacentile's Second Amended Complaint [D.E. 34] is dismissed.

December 30, 2010


Summaries of

U.S. v. Sanofi Synthelabo, Inc.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Dec 30, 2010
Civ. Action No. 05-2927 (KSH) (D.N.J. Dec. 30, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Sanofi Synthelabo, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., EX REL. JOSEPH PIACENTILE, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Dec 30, 2010

Citations

Civ. Action No. 05-2927 (KSH) (D.N.J. Dec. 30, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Motor Coach Indus.

, relaxing the Rule 9(b) standard is inappropriate.” Piacentile v. Sanofi Synthelabo, Inc., No. 05-2927, …

United States ex rel. Laporte v. Premier Educ. Grp., L.P.

The reasons for the court's dismissal in Bumgarner are not important for the purposes of determining whether…