From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Sanford

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 13, 2010
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01821-REB (D. Colo. Aug. 13, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01821-REB.

August 13, 2010


GARNISHEE ORDER


The matter before me is the plaintiff's Motion For Entry of Garnishee Order [#9] filed August 10, 2010. A Writ of Garnishment, directed to Garnishee, has been duly issued and served on the Garnishee. Pursuant to the Writ of Garnishment, the Garnishee filed an Answer on July 14, 2010, stating that at the time of the service of the Writ he had in his possession or under his control personal property belonging to and due Defendant and that garnishee was indebted to Defendant in the form of wages paid to the debtor.

On June 14, 2010, Defendant was notified of his right to a hearing and has not requested a hearing to determine exempt property. After reviewing the file and the motion, I conclude that the motion should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That plaintiff's Motion For Entry of Garnishee Order [#9] filed August 10, 2010, is GRANTED;

2. That Garnishee pay each period twenty-five per cent (25%) of defendant's disposable wages to Plaintiff and continue the payments until the debt to the Plaintiff is paid in full or until the garnishee no longer has custody, possession or control of any property belonging to the debtor or until further order of this Court.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Sanford

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Aug 13, 2010
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01821-REB (D. Colo. Aug. 13, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Sanford

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LEONARD C. SANFORD, Defendant, and…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Aug 13, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01821-REB (D. Colo. Aug. 13, 2010)