From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Sanchez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 29, 2001
18 F. App'x 534 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion


18 Fed.Appx. 534 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Manuel SANCHEZ, a/k/a Manny Sanchez, Defendant--Appellant. No. 00-50321. D.C. No. CR-99-01167-ABC-01. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 29, 2001

Submitted August 13, 2001.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Audrey B. Collins, District Judge, Presiding.

Before HAWKINS, TASHIMA and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Manuel Sanchez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to distribution of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Sanchez's attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Sanchez did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Having conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Sanchez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 29, 2001
18 F. App'x 534 (9th Cir. 2001)
Case details for

U.S. v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Manuel SANCHEZ, a/k/a…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 29, 2001

Citations

18 F. App'x 534 (9th Cir. 2001)

Citing Cases

Meyers v. Kernan

Likewise, in DeLong v. Terhune, the Ninth Circuit held that an “R” suffix was “justified . . . because of…

Meyers v. Kernan

Likewise, in DeLong v. Terhune, the Ninth Circuit held that an “R” suffix was “justified . . . because of…