U.S. v. Salgado-Castillo

Full title: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Simon SALGADO-CASTILLO…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 18, 2003

61 F. App'x 485 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

61 Fed.Appx. 485 (9th Cir. 2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Simon SALGADO-CASTILLO, aka Jorge Mangares-Paredes, Defendant--Appellant. No. 02-10416. D.C. No. CR-02-00231-SMM. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 18, 2003

Submitted April 7, 2003. ^*

* This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding.

Before RYMER, KLEINFELD and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Simon Salgado-Castillo appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence for unlawful reentry following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Salgado-Castillo has filed a brief stating that there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Salgado-Castillo has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no further issues for review. Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.