U.S. v. Salcido-Ortega

Full title: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Ivan…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 20, 2002

31 F. App'x 385 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

31 Fed.Appx. 385 (9th Cir. 2002) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Ivan SALCIDO-ORTEGA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 00-30137. D.C. No. CR-99-00571-RSL. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 20, 2002

February 11, 2002 ^*.

* This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding.

Before B. FLETCHER, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Carlos Ivan Salcido-Ortega appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence imposed for distribution of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S. C § 841(a)(1), § 841(b)(1)(B), and § 841(b)(1)(c). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Salcido-Ortega's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no arguable issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Salcido-Ortega has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Page 386.

Having conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues on direct appeal.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.