Similarly, and recently, in United States v. Safahi, Judge Illston rejected a duplicity challenge to including both section 1344(1) and 1344(2) in the indictment. She found that “[t]he bank fraud statute is disjunctive, permitting conviction upon proof of either Section 1344(1) or 1344(2).” No. 19-CR-00404-SI-1, 2022 WL 2356769, at *17 (N.D. Cal. June 30, 2022).