From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rudolph

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 24, 2008
02-CR-0069 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2008)

Opinion

02-CR-0069.

January 24, 2008


DECISION and ORDER


Defendant moves pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 or, in the alternative, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to have this Court declare that his federal sentence runs concurrently with his later imposed state sentence. Because the instant motion was made more than seven days after sentencing, no relief may be afforded under Rule 35(a). No relief can be afforded under Rule 35(b) because the government has not made such an application. No relief can be afforded under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because such a petition would be untimely (more than one year after judgment was entered and more than one year after Defendant was paroled by the State of New York and released into the custody of the U.S. Marshals Service) and Defendant has failed to demonstrate any grounds warranting relief under § 2255.

For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rudolph

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Jan 24, 2008
02-CR-0069 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rudolph

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. WHIRLEE RUDOLPH, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Jan 24, 2008

Citations

02-CR-0069 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 24, 2008)