From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rudisill

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 12, 2010
397 F. App'x 916 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-7009.

Submitted: September 30, 2010.

Decided: October 12, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:01-cr-00048-MR-9).

Timnah K. Rudisill, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorneys, Jill Westmoreland Rose, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Timnah K. Rudisill appeals the district court's order denying his "Emergency Motion for Dismissal and/or Immediate Release Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Rudisill, No. l:01-cr-00048-MR-9, 2010 WL 2509900 (W.D.N.C. June 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rudisill

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 12, 2010
397 F. App'x 916 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rudisill

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Timnah K. RUDISILL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 12, 2010

Citations

397 F. App'x 916 (4th Cir. 2010)