From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rucker

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 7, 2010
395 F. App'x 62 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

NO. 10-6913.

Submitted: August 26, 2010.

Decided: September 7, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:98-cr-00101-RLW-2; 3:07-cv-00074-RLW).

Santra Lavonne Rucker, Appellant Pro Se. Sara Elizabeth Chase, John Staige Davis, V, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Santra Lavonne Rucker seeks to appeal the district court's order denying as untimely her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rucker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rucker

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 7, 2010
395 F. App'x 62 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rucker

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Santra Lavonne RUCKER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 7, 2010

Citations

395 F. App'x 62 (4th Cir. 2010)