From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rubis

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 2011
Criminal No. 10-177 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Criminal No. 10-177.

January 3, 2011


ORDER OF COURT


AND NOW, to-wit, this 3rd day of January 2011, upon consideration of the foregoing Defendant Jeffrey Rubis' Motion to Extend Time for Filing Pretrial Motions, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that said motion be and the same hereby is, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the extension of time caused by this continuance be deemed excludable delay under the Speedy Trial Act 18 U.S.C. § 3161 et seq. Specifically, the court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant to a speedy trial, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), since, for the reasons stated in defendant's motion, the failure to grant such continuance would unreasonably deny counsel for the defendant reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any pretrial motions referred to in Local Criminal Rule 12 are due on or before February 2, 2011.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rubis

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 3, 2011
Criminal No. 10-177 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rubis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY RUBIS

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 3, 2011

Citations

Criminal No. 10-177 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 3, 2011)