Opinion
No. 06-56387.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed February 26, 2007.
U.S. Atty. CAS, USSD-Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Edmundo Rubi, Taft, CA, pro se.
Morris Sankary, Esq., Del Mar, CA, John L. Morrell, Esq., Higgs Fletcher Mack, LLP, San Diego, CA, for Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-01-01641-LAB.
Before: GOODWIN, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The district court docket shows that the docketing and filing fees were paid for this appeal on September 27, 2006. Thus, no docketing and filing fees are due.
A review of the record and the response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.