From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rosalez

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 4, 2009
Criminal Case No. 09-cr-00301-JLK (D. Colo. Dec. 4, 2009)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 09-cr-00301-JLK.

December 4, 2009


ORDER


THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the United States' Unopposed Motion for a Protective Order for Certain Discovery Materials (doc. #174), filed December 4, 2009. The Court, having considered the motion, makes the following findings of fact:

1. The defendant is charged with aggravated assault resulting from an incident involving the defendant while he was an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institution in Florence, Colorado. The incident also involved other inmates, some of whom are charged as co-defendants in this case, and other who have been charged in separate cases.

2. The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has produced to the United States Attorney's office records, documents, and materials (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Records") that include the following: (i) floor plans and layouts of the Federal Correctional Institution; and (ii) criminal histories taken from presentence reports of the defendant, his co-actors, and other inmates who may be called as witnesses at trial; (iii) internal documents from the defendant's, victim's, and potential witnesses' BOP files, which contain identifying information about the inmate including his security designation, disciplinary behavior, home of record, sentence computation and release information, and other sensitive information.

3. The production of the floor plans and layouts of the institution poses a potential threat to the security of the facility. The production of the presentence report criminal histories requires the divulging of court documents, and the disclosure of information from BOP internal files could affect an inmate's safety and the dissemination of some private or privileged information.

4. The government has produced other discovery to defense counsel, but requests entry of a protective order implementing the mechanisms stated below prior to the release of the records detailed above.

5. Counsel for the defendant has no objection to this protective order.

WHEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. The government will provide defense counsel with a copy of the records on a separate compact disc. Defense counsel shall keep the records and any notes or other materials prepared based upon or referring to information in these records in confidence and shall use them exclusively in connection with this case (including trial preparation, trial, and appeals or other related legal proceedings) and for no other purpose.

2. The records may be viewed only by defense counsel, the defendant, and members of the defense team, including any defense investigators and staff, as are necessary for the purposes of preparing a defense in this particular case, and, with respect to staff personnel, the records may only be viewed by necessary staff while they are operating under the direct supervision and control of defense counsel. Defense counsel shall ensure that all persons in his office, who are to handle such information, read this Order and are informed of their responsibility to safeguard this information.

3. Defense counsel shall make only such copies as are necessary to prepare a defense of this criminal case. Defense counsel shall keep a written record concerning how many copies were made, to whom those copies were delivered, and the dates of delivery. Defense counsel shall also deliver a copy of this order with the materials. No person other than defense counsel shall make any copy of these materials for any purpose whatsoever.

4. No copies of the records shall be provided to the defendant under any circumstances without petition to and further order of the Court. The defendant may be allowed to view the documents, but only while in the direct presence of the defense counsel.

5. A copy of this Order shall be kept with the records at all times.

6. To the extent that the Privacy Act may be asserted as a basis for withholding certain documents or portions of documents requested by defendant, the United States Department of Justice and its agents or representatives are authorized to produce the requested documents because the information contained therein is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action or appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, and the defendant's need for disclosure of such records outweighs the Privacy Act's concerns against disclosure so long as these appropriate protective measures are taken.

7. At the conclusion of the case in this court, by entry of the Court's judgment, counsel within ten days shall collect all such copies and return them to the government.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rosalez

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 4, 2009
Criminal Case No. 09-cr-00301-JLK (D. Colo. Dec. 4, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rosalez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 4. MARK ROSALEZ, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Dec 4, 2009

Citations

Criminal Case No. 09-cr-00301-JLK (D. Colo. Dec. 4, 2009)