From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Roman

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jul 28, 1992
968 F.2d 11 (11th Cir. 1992)

Opinion

No. 90-9084.

July 28, 1992.

Hulane E. George, Milledgeville, Ga. (court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

Michael T. Solis, George F. Peterman, III, Asst. U.S. Attys., Macon, Ga., Thomas M. Gannon, Appellate Section, Crim. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia; Wilbur D. Owens, Jr., Chief Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion May 7, 1992, 11th Cir., 1992, 960 F.2d 130)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.


A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Roman

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jul 28, 1992
968 F.2d 11 (11th Cir. 1992)
Case details for

U.S. v. Roman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LAZARO ROMAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jul 28, 1992

Citations

968 F.2d 11 (11th Cir. 1992)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Medlock

We do not know what, if any, weight that testimony had on the court's decision not to enhance Medlock's…

U.S. v. Roman

United States v. Roman, No. 90-9084 (11th Cir. May 7, 1992). We vacated the panel opinion, 968 F.2d 11 (11th…