From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rodriguez-Palomares

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 23, 2008
294 F. App'x 312 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 06-50665.

Submitted September 8, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed September 23, 2008.

Christopher A. Ott, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gordon S. Brownell, Esq., St. Helen, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Jeffrey T. Miller, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-01965-JTM.

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Armando Rodriguez-Palomares appeals from his bench-trial conviction and 54-month sentence for attempted entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rodriguez-Palomares's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Appellant has filed a pro se supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rodriguez-Palomares

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 23, 2008
294 F. App'x 312 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rodriguez-Palomares

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Armando…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 23, 2008

Citations

294 F. App'x 312 (9th Cir. 2008)