From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 2005
Criminal No. 01:04-CR-0080 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2005)

Opinion

Criminal No. 01:04-CR-0080.

October 7, 2005


ORDER


AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2005, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 43) for reconsideration of the sentence imposed upon the defendant in the above-captioned case, and it appearing that the motion does not aver any manifest errors of law or fact, or present any newly discovered evidence, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence."); Dodge v. Susquehanna Univ., 796 F. Supp. 829, 830 (M.D. Pa. 1992) (cautioning that mere disagreement with the court does not translate into a clear error of law); see also FED. R. CRIM. P. 35(a) (allowing court to correct a sentence "that resulted from arithmetical, technical, or other clear error"), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 43) for reconsideration is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rodriguez

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 2005
Criminal No. 01:04-CR-0080 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALBERTO DEJESUS RODRIGUEZ

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 7, 2005

Citations

Criminal No. 01:04-CR-0080 (M.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 2005)