From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rodriguez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 18, 2008
263 F. App'x 657 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-30084.

Submitted January 14, 2008.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed January 18, 2008.

Paulette L. Stewart, Esq., USHE-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Helena, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Donahoe, Esq., FDMT-Federal Defenders of Montana Helena Branch Office, Helena, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Charles C. Lovell, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CK-06-00021-CCL.

Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Jeremy Joseph Rodriguez appeals from his 21-month sentence for being an unlawful user of a controlled substance in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rodriguez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We provided Rodriguez with an opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rodriguez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 18, 2008
263 F. App'x 657 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeremy Joseph RODRIGUEZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 18, 2008

Citations

263 F. App'x 657 (9th Cir. 2008)