From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Rodrigues

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 28, 1998
170 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-10113

Argued and Submitted July 13, 1998 — San Francisco, California

Filed October 28, 1998 March 15, 1999

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Ronald M. Whyte, District Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. CR-94-20031-RMW.

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, John T. Noonan, and David R. Thompson, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The opinion filed on October 28, 1998 is amended as follows:

At slip op. p. 12496, first ¶, lns 1-2 [ 159 F.3d at 339]: Replace "Assistant United States Attorney Stephen Schirle" with "the prosecutor".

Slip op. p. 12496, third ¶, lns 2-3 [ 159 F.3d at 449]: Replace "Assistant United States Attorney Schirle" with "the prosecutor".

Same paragraph, lns 7 9 [ 159 F.3d at 449]: Replace "Schirle" with "the prosecutor".

Slip op. p. 12497, first ¶, ln 1 [ 159 F.3d at 449]: Replace "Assistant United States Attorney Wayne T. Lamprey" with "The prosecutor".

Slip op. p. 12499, first ¶, lns 3-4 [ 159 F.3d at 450]: Replace "Assistant United States Attorney Schirle" with "the prosecutor".

Same paragraph, ln 5 [ 159 F.3d at 450]: Replace "Assistant United States Attorney Lamprey" with "the prosecutor".

Slip op. p. 12499, second ¶, lns 4 7 [ 159 F.3d at 450]: Replace "Lamprey" with "The prosecutor".

Slip op. p. 12499, third ¶, ln 1 [ 159 F.3d at 450]: Replace "Lamprey" with "The prosecutor".

With these amendments, the petitions for rehearing are DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Rodrigues

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 28, 1998
170 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 1998)
Case details for

U.S. v. Rodrigues

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JESS A. RODRIGUES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 28, 1998

Citations

170 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Tucker

In contrast to the case cited by Tucker, the adjective was limited to one particular statement by defense…

Shendi v. Cate

Here, any possible prejudice was cured by the trial court's instructions which included the admonishment that…