But they certainly do not compel one. See U.S.S.G. ยง 5H1.1 ("Age may be a reason to depart downward . . . ." (emphasis added)); United States v. Sims, 511 F. App'x 429, 431 (6th Cir. 2013) ("In recognizing that veterans have traditionally been afforded leniency, the Supreme Court did not require leniency" in Porter v. McCollum, 558 U.S. 30 (2009)); United States v. Riley, 290 F. App'x 910, 912 (6th Cir. 2008) (affirming a district court's decision not to vary downward despite recognizing that the defendant's "good work history" was "suggestive of leniency"); United States v. Husein, 478 F.3d 318, 330 (6th Cir. 2007) (noting that district courts "have the discretion to weigh . . . education" as a mitigating factor at sentencing (emphasis added and quotation omitted)). All in all, the district court acted well within the bounds of reason when it sentenced Leal at the low end of the guidelines range to 100 months of imprisonment.