From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Riddick

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 13, 2010
397 F. App'x 870 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-6242.

Submitted: September 28, 2010.

Decided: October 13, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:00-cr-00067-JBF-2).

John D. Riddick, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorneys, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before KING, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


John D. Riddick, Sr., appeals the district court's order denying his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Riddick, No. 2:00-cr-00067-JBF-2 (E.D.Va. Aug. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Riddick

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 13, 2010
397 F. App'x 870 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Riddick

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John D. RIDDICK, Sr.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 13, 2010

Citations

397 F. App'x 870 (4th Cir. 2010)