From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Reyes

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2006
No. CR. S 96-0407 DFL PAN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2006)

Opinion

No. CR. S 96-0407 DFL PAN.

February 8, 2006


ORDER


Defendant, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 1, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Defendant has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 1, 2005, are adopted in full.

2. Defendant's April 2, 2001, motion to vacate or set aside sentence is denied. The Clerk of the Court shall close the companion civil case number Civ. S 00-1433 MCE PAN P.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Reyes

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 8, 2006
No. CR. S 96-0407 DFL PAN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Reyes

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Amado Bettencourt Reyes, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 8, 2006

Citations

No. CR. S 96-0407 DFL PAN (E.D. Cal. Feb. 8, 2006)