From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Revels

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Aug 2, 2011
No. 1:10-CR-110 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:10-CR-110.

August 2, 2011


ORDER


Defendant has filed a Motion to Determine Mental Competency (Court File No. 132). The motion was referred to United States Magistrate Judge William B. Mitchell Carter to conduct an evidentiary hearing and make a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C). The magistrate judge has filed a report and recommendation (Court File No. 346). Neither party filed objections within the given ten days.

After reviewing the record and the applicable law, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and hereby ORDERS the following:

(1) The defendant is competent to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him and is able to assist in his defense; and

(2) The defendant is competent to stand trial.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Revels

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga
Aug 2, 2011
No. 1:10-CR-110 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 2, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Revels

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARY REVELS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Chattanooga

Date published: Aug 2, 2011

Citations

No. 1:10-CR-110 (E.D. Tenn. Aug. 2, 2011)