From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Redd

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 4, 2009
354 F.3d 268 (8th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-2561.

Submitted: November 24, 2009.

Filed: December 4, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.


[UNPUBLISHED]


Kenneth Redd appeals the district court's denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Redd's motion, as the evidence that Redd submitted was available before his trial, and was not relevant to the issues in his suppression motion or his trial. See United States v. Grover, 511 F.3d 779, 783 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of review; requirements to justify new trial under Rule 33).

The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. We also grant counsel's motion to with draw and deny Redd's motion for appointment of new counsel.


Summaries of

United States v. Redd

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 4, 2009
354 F.3d 268 (8th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

United States v. Redd

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Kenneth REDD, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Dec 4, 2009

Citations

354 F.3d 268 (8th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

REDD v. U.S.

The Eighth Circuit affirmed this Court's order denying Movant's Motion For a New Trial on direct appeal and…