Thus, the terms of the plea agreement clearly and unambiguously evidence the Government had not promised a five-year sentence to induce Movant to plead guilty. See United States v. Rashid, 2010 WL 1486495, at *3 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 12, 2010) (dismissing a § 2255 petition where defendant claimed counsel promised a 186-month sentence but the plea agreement “clearly reflects” counsel could not make a “binding prediction or promise regarding the sentence he will receive”).
Further, the claims that an attorney would guarantee a win and refuse to let his client take a plea bargain are palpably incredible. See United States v. Rashid, 2010 WL 1486495 at *5 (E.D. Cal, April 13, 2010) (holding that a prisoner claiming that his attorney would guarantee the prisoner a specific sentence was palpably incredible). F. Alleged Failure for not Challenging the Sufficiency of the Evidence or Fully Briefing Inducement on Appeal