From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ramirez-Solis

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 9, 2008
285 F. App'x 406 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 06-10235.

Submitted June 18, 2008.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed July 9, 2008.

Bruce M. Ferg, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Francisco Leon, Esq., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Frank R. Zapata, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-01457-FRZ.

Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


David Ramirez-Solis appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ramirez-Solis

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 9, 2008
285 F. App'x 406 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ramirez-Solis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David RAMIREZ-SOLIS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 9, 2008

Citations

285 F. App'x 406 (9th Cir. 2008)