U.S. v. Ramirez-Olivares

Full title: United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Joel…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 19, 1998

141 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 1998)

Opinion

141 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 1998) United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Joel RAMIREZ-OLIVARES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-10097. No. CR-95-00495-GEB United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit March 19, 1998

Submitted March 10, 1998 ²

2 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Garland E. Burrell, District Judge, Presiding.

Before FLETCHER, BEEZER and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ¹

1 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Luis Joel Ramirez-Olivares appeals the 24 month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction to illegal reentry by a previously deported felon, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. His attorney has filed a brief stating that he can identify no issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our examination of counsel's brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues for review. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.