From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ramirez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 31, 2010
372 F. App'x 811 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 08-50418.

Submitted March 16, 2010.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed March 31, 2010.

Asha Muldro Olivas, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Michael J. Raphael, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jonathan D. Libby, Esquire, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Rosendo Mora Ramirez, Tucson, AZ, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 2:08-cr-00622-PSG.

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Rosendo Mora Ramirez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Mora Ramirez's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to § 1326(b). See United States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte to delete the reference to § 1326(b)).

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED, and the case is REMANDED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ramirez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 31, 2010
372 F. App'x 811 (9th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rosendo MORA RAMIREZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 31, 2010

Citations

372 F. App'x 811 (9th Cir. 2010)