From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ramirez

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division
Mar 4, 2010
CRIMINAL NO. B-07-041-1 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2010)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. B-07-041-1.

March 4, 2010


ORDER


Pending is the Magistrate Judge's December 28, 2009, Report and Recommendation in the above-referenced cause of action. [Doc. No. 63] No objections have been lodged by either side and the time for doing so has expired. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation for plain error and having found none, it is the opinion of the Court that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be ADOPTED.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED, that equitable tolling does not apply to the facts in this case, and that Mr. Aris Ramirez' Motion for an Extension to File a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct His Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Doc. No. 60] is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ramirez

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division
Mar 4, 2010
CRIMINAL NO. B-07-041-1 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ramirez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BEN ARIS RAMIREZ, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Brownsville Division

Date published: Mar 4, 2010

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. B-07-041-1 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2010)

Citing Cases

United States v. Mills

See Petty, 530 F.3d at 365. Prison lockdowns generally do not justify equitable tolling. See, e.g., Coppin v.…

Coppin v. United States

See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 362 (1996) (Lockdown prisoners "routinely experience delays in receiving…