From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Quiroz

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 2007
221 F. App'x 578 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 05-50028.

Submitted February 20, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed February 23, 2007.

Douglas F. McCormick, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Tanaka, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Gary L. Taylor, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-92-00023-GLT.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Benjamin Dino Quiroz appeals from the judgment revoking supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Quiroz has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Quiroz

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 2007
221 F. App'x 578 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Quiroz

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Benjamin Dino QUIROZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 23, 2007

Citations

221 F. App'x 578 (9th Cir. 2007)