From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. PULK

United States District Court, D. Maine
Mar 20, 2007
Crim. No. 06-59-P-S (D. Me. Mar. 20, 2007)

Opinion

Crim. No. 06-59-P-S.

March 20, 2007


ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE


The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on January 24, 2007, his Recommended Decision (Docket No. 128). Defendant Timothy Pulk filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (Docket No. 145) on February 8, 2007. The Government filed its response to Defendant Pulk's Objection (Docket No. 149) on February 13, 2007. Defendant Angela Sargent did not file an objection to the Recommended Decision.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is ORDERED that the motion to suppress of defendant Timothy Pulk (Docket No. 85) and the joint motion to suppress of defendants Timothy Pulk and Angela Sargent (docket No. 87) are DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. PULK

United States District Court, D. Maine
Mar 20, 2007
Crim. No. 06-59-P-S (D. Me. Mar. 20, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. PULK

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIMOTHY PULK and ANGELA SARGENT, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Maine

Date published: Mar 20, 2007

Citations

Crim. No. 06-59-P-S (D. Me. Mar. 20, 2007)