From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Priscella

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 13, 2007
Criminal No. 06-46 (PAM/AJB) (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2007)

Opinion

Criminal No. 06-46 (PAM/AJB).

February 13, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated January 8, 2007. Defendant has filed no objections to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted for objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b); D. Minn. LR 72.2(a). The Court therefore ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 30) and HEREBY ORDERS that:

1. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure (Docket No. 21) is DENIED; and
2. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions, and Answers (Docket No. 22) is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Priscella

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 13, 2007
Criminal No. 06-46 (PAM/AJB) (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Priscella

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. John I. Priscella, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 13, 2007

Citations

Criminal No. 06-46 (PAM/AJB) (D. Minn. Feb. 13, 2007)